Trang chủInternational FootballSpain's two-star shirt and the Adidas deal that has yet to be repriced

Spain's two-star shirt and the Adidas deal that has yet to be repriced

Core answer: Liên đoàn bóng đá Tây Ban Nha (RFEF) thu khoảng 20 triệu euro mỗi năm từ hợp đồng áo đấu, bằng một phần năm của Pháp, Đức và Brazil (khoảng 100 triệu euro), dù đội nam và nữ đứng đầu FIFA. Doanh số áo thấp hơn năm lần. Hợp đồng Adidas của RFEF hết hạn năm 2030. Key facts: - Marca (Goal.com dẫn lại): doanh thu áo đấu của RFEF bằng khoảng một phần năm Pháp, Đức, Brazil. - Pháp, Đức và Brazil dẫn đầu với khoảng 100 triệu euro mỗi năm; có liên đoàn vượt mức đó. - Doanh số bán áo của Tây Ban Nha thấp hơn năm lần so với Pháp, Đức và Brazil. - Italy (vắng ba kỳ World Cup liên tiếp) và Portugal vẫn kiếm nhiều hơn Tây Ban Nha; Portugal nhờ Cristiano Ronaldo. - Hợp đồng Adidas của RFEF hết hạn năm 2030, trùng năm World Cup đồng đăng cai Tây Ban Nha, Portugal và Morocco. Source attribution: Goal.com, dẫn theo báo Marca (Tây Ban Nha), bản tin tháng 9 năm 2026 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn Related Q&A: Q: Vì sao Tây Ban Nha kiếm ít hơn dù đang vô địch? A: Giá trị áo đấu gắn với tài sản thương hiệu tích lũy qua nhiều năm, không chỉ thành tích hiện tại — Italy vẫn kiếm nhiều hơn dù vắng ba kỳ World Cup (chỉ số độ sâu thương hiệu của VangBong.vn). Q: Khi nào Tây Ban Nha có thể đàm phán lại hợp đồng áo đấu? A: Hợp đồng Adidas hết hạn năm 2030; cửa sổ đàm phán thực tế nằm ở chu kỳ 2028–2030. Q: Rủi ro lớn nhất của thương vụ này là gì? A: Adidas nắm quyền ưu tiên, khiến RFEF gia hạn tăng nhẹ thay vì đấu thầu, và đánh mất cơ hội định giá lại.

On Lamine Yamal's chest, a second star has just been stitched. At Wembley the Spanish stands rose to their feet, and not long afterwards the official two-star shirt was unveiled in Seville. It was a merchandising moment stage-managed with great care — and I only saw it through a screen, from Shenzhen, more than ten thousand kilometres away. In Shenzhen I learned that a screen cannot replace the stands; but the screen was enough to reveal a mismatch that 39 years of following football had never made so plain. Amid the roar, a contract simply sits there, and it will sit there until 2030. Spain's men's and women's senior teams both top the FIFA rankings — a rare feat. They won Euro 2026, then the 2026 World Cup. Their youth sides contest and win almost every title, most recently the Under-20 Women's World Cup. No federation currently holds so much silverware at once. And yet, according to a Marca report relayed by Goal.com, the Spanish Football Federation (RFEF) earns roughly one-fifth of what France, Germany and Brazil make from their kit deals — the leading group at around 100 million euros a year, with some federations exceeding even that. Spain's shirt sales are five times lower than those same three nations. What makes this hard to swallow is not the gap to France or Germany, but that Italy — absent from three consecutive World Cups — still out-earns Spain. So does Portugal, and the explanation fits into a single name: Cristiano Ronaldo. One enduring star can hold a federation's commercial value aloft for years, regardless of how results swing. Data is a map; the match is territory no one has ever fully surveyed. The commercial map here draws a Spain far smaller than reality, and I suspect it has been out of date for a long time. I keep time for past seasons, even when no one is listening; but this time the rhythm is off not because of memory, but because a signature has yet to be made. Start with the most concrete fact. If the leading group sits at around 100 million euros a year and Spain earns only one-fifth of that, the RFEF's current figure lands near 20 million euros — a number Marca never states outright but that the arithmetic forces us to infer, and I always mark figures that have to be inferred. The first thing I write in my notebook: Spain's commercial value is systematically underpriced — the cause lies in unexploited brand equity, not in results. Marca says plainly that the gap comes from history and marketing accumulated over many years, not from current performance alone. That is the academic way of saying something very simple: selling shirts is not the same as scoring goals. The contract anchor sits elsewhere. Adidas is Spain's long-standing partner, and the current deal runs to 2030 — the very year of the World Cup co-hosted by Spain, Portugal and Morocco. Marca warns that kit negotiations usually begin at the start of a new World Cup cycle, and that waiting until 2030 would waste four years of a rare opportunity. The most important precedent has already happened: in 2026, German football ended a 72-year partnership with Adidas to switch to Nike, after renegotiating its shirt value and receiving a larger sum. A seven-decade partner can still be broken, and major brands are watching the Spain file closely. What sets the Spanish asset apart is not the present but the age curve. The men's squad is not a group of stars winding down; these are players who will hit their peak at the 2030 World Cup. Lamine Yamal is described as an unrivalled global icon whose shirt sells on every continent. Pau Cubarsí and Nico Williams sit alongside him on that list. In the women's team, Vicky López fronts a generation while Clara Serrajordi follows in her footsteps. This is the most durable commercial base any brand could sign a long-term deal against — and it stays open for only four or five years. There is one asset the source article all but forgets. Both Spain's men's and women's teams rank number one, and the women's youth sides keep winning titles, yet the women's game gets a single short paragraph. Based on my own experience tracking matches, this is the most underpriced part of all: women's commercial value is harder to measure, which means the proportional upside is larger than the men's. And here is where I am forced to doubt. The target of at least fivefold is almost certainly a negotiating anchor, not a forecast. Federations habitually publish an ambitious figure right before a renegotiation to engineer their own leverage — and its appearance around the unveiling of the two-star shirt is unlikely to be coincidence. The Italy paradox, in turn, is a warning rather than a comfort: brand equity is sticky and slow-moving, so even if Spain signs a new deal, the gap will not close within a single season. No rule is broken in this story. The risk lies in delay: Adidas holds priority status, and a relationship both sides boast about could easily produce a modest renewal instead of a genuine auction. In a story like this, timing — not the figure — is what is being gambled. The thing worth watching lies elsewhere: whether the Spanish federation opens a genuinely competitive process or simply sits down again with its old friend. The realistic window is the 2028–2030 cycle, after the 2026 title and before the World Cup kicks off on home soil. Transfers are the art of waiting; I specialise in recording the weary minutes. But waiting here is not a virtue — it is what will be paid for. If Spain lets this window slip, the question for 2031 will be a different one: why did their victories turn out to be worth so little?

Spain's two-star shirt and the Adidas deal that has yet to be repriced

Spain's two-star shirt and the Adidas deal that has yet to be repriced

Spain's two-star shirt and the Adidas deal that has yet to be repriced